| Dutch Elm Disease | Cycle | Elm | Host respons to DED |
Gels and tyloses (wall 1)
Rioux et al.{[83]} analyzed the well-developed cell wall composition of tyloses in DED-infected U. americana. The primary wall of the tylose was shown to contain cellulose and a small amount of pectin. The flexibility of this wall permits expansion of the tylose. Increased esterification of the primary wall after tylosis maturation might improve resistance to attack by fungal pectinases. Secondary wall formation was rarely detected in tyloses of the American elm. However, a suberized layer was formed against the primary wall layer (or internal to the secondary layer, when present) in tyloses that had completed their expansion {[83]}. Suberin is a protective coating, consisting of long chain fatty acids, hydroxylated fatty acids, long-chain alcohols, and phenolics (primarily ferulic acid). The phenolics are thought to bind the lipid fraction of the suberin (up to half of the total suberin) to the cell wall {[695]}. Suberized tyloses are randomly formed in U. americana {[699]}. Occasionally, the internal suberized layer appears to be covered with an additional layer containing ß(1(4)-D-glucans {[83]}. The formation of such defense-related compounds as suberin, lignin, and a number of phytoalexins is catalyzed by phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL), the key enzyme of the phenylpropanoid pathway. There is conflicting evidence concerning a possible correlation between DED resistance and a rapid, transient increase in PAL activity {[194],[495]}. Besides PAL, elms have been reported to synthesize several enzymes potentially involved in signal transduction pathways {[194],[243]}. Secretion of pectin occurs during the formation of gels (gums) and tyloses in American elm. In continuation with the protective layer, the primary cell wall of expanding tyloses secretes pectin microfibrils into the vessel elements. The material appears to be pushed towards areas that cannot be clogged completely by the tylosis primary wall, such as chambers of bordered and half-bordered pits, void spaces left between the tylose and the vessel wall, the vicinity of the rim of vessel perforation plates, and in vessel areas where the curving angle of the secondary wall is very pronounced. In places where the tylosis primary wall exhibits close contact with the xylem vessel wall, the pectic layer is very thin and hardly discernible {[699]}. Besides a complete blockage of the vessel elements, the secreted pectin may promote cohesion of the tylosis wall to other structures {[237]}. Recent experiments by Rioux et al. {[237]} showed the vascular blockage by gels and tyloses in U. americana around 4 to 6 days post-inoculation at 2 to 3 mm from the inoculation wound. Elgersma {[594]} observed vascular occlusions as early as two days after DED infection. At 3 to 5 days post-inoculation the number of vessels showing tyloses appears to be significantly higher in resistant elms compared to susceptible trees {[697]}. The rate of tylosis formation exhibited by a particular elm appears to be independent of the fungal pathogen used to infect the tree. The DED-susceptible U. hollandica "Belgica" and the resistant U. hollandica clone 390 exhibit no difference in the rapidity of tylosis formation after infection with either the aggressive O. novo-ulmi, the non-aggressive O. ulmi, or Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici {[698]}. The latter fungus is not pathogenic to elms. In general, tylosis formation does not seem to be involved in early host-response to DED infection. However, occlusion of vessels by tyloses and gels may support the accumulation of phytoalexins {[694]}. | ||||
|
|
HOST RESPONSE TO DED | Barrier zones (wall 4) |
|